What is the difference between the Intel Core i5-4690k and 4670k?
The Intel Core i5-4690K is the latest incremental upgrade to Intel’s unlocked mid-range quad core family of processors. The 4690K replaces the 4670K. Comparing the 4690K and 4670K shows that little has changed. The two chips share identical architecture; in fact the only difference between them is a 100 MHz bump to both the base and turbo clocks.
Is the core i5-4690 good for gaming?
The Core i5-4690 is Intel’s latest and greatest locked Core-i5. This CPU will suit serious gamers that don’t plan on overclocking. The 4690 replaces the 4670 and shares exactly the same specs aside from base and turbo clock bumps of 100 MHz. The 100 MHz clock bump results in barely noticeable real world performance improvements and,…
What is the difference between the 4670 and the 4690?
The 4690 replaces the 4670 and shares exactly the same specs aside from base and turbo clock bumps of 100 MHz. The 100 MHz clock bump results in barely noticeable real world performance improvements and, if anything, makes the older 4670 more attractive as suppliers reduce prices to try to clear stocks.
Is the i5-3570k a good processor?
The Core i5-3570K Ivy Bridge processor is one of Intel’s best performers to date. In terms of real world performance this processor offers far more than most users are likely to ever need. Scoring 2012 points on the PassMark Single Thread benchmark, the 3570K is within a few percent of the fastest processors currently available
Is the i5 4690 good for gaming?
The Core i5-4690 is Intel’s latest and greatest locked Core-i5. This CPU will suit serious gamers that don’t plan on overclocking. The 4690 replaces the 4670 and shares exactly the same specs aside from base and turbo clock bumps of 100 MHz.
Is the i7-3770k a good processor for a consumer?
The third gen Ivy Bridge Core i7-3770K can’t really be described as a consumer orientated processor. With 8 threads and four cores its capabilities are better aligned to server use. For price insensitive consumers that want the best of the best, this is currently one of the fastest processors available.
How does the AMD FX-8350 compare to the Intel i5-2500k?
The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%.
Is the AMD FX-8350 a good choice for a server?
Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition.